Kunz v. Connecticut Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover damages suffered as a result of a fall while a passenger in a bus of the defendant company, caused by his stepping upon a loose bolt on the floor when he arose to leave the bus. While the record does not show this, counsel for both parties agree that the trial court directed a verdict for the defendant, which the jury rendered, and from the refusal of the trial court to set it aside the plaintiff has appealed.
He bases his right to recover upon the ground that had the defendant exercised due care in the inspection of the bus it would have discovered…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Briganti v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Laflin v. Lomas & Nettleton Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Lindsey v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Byrne v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Texas & Pac. Ry. Co. v. HansonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
3Cited by3 opinions
- D. C. Transit System, Inc. v. SmithDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1961
- Gothreau v. New York, New Haven & Hartford RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Ross v. Pennsylvania R.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947