Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hibbens

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 10, 1923No. 24,295PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; Joseph W. Holdhen, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*122The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The defendant appeals from a judgment against him in a lump sum under the workmen’s compensation law.

The jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff for $4,000.40 and answered special questions as follows;

“1. Do you find that the plaintiff, Davis, was totally incapacitated from work for any length of time on account of his injury? A. Yes.
“2. If you answer the above question, ‘yes,’ state how long said total incapacity for work continued, or if you find that plaintiff is still totally incapacitated for work, then state when you find…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roper v. HammerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  2. Boyd v. J. R. Crowe Coal & Mining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1919
  3. Southern v. Western States Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Duncan ex rel. Duncan v. Kansas City Packing Box Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. Young v. Shellabarger Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  3. Fronk v. Ajax Drilling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  4. Reeder v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
  5. McKarnin v. Armour & Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API