Legal Opinion

D & L Supply Co. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided May 8, 1997No. Nos. 95-1437, 95-1450PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRYSON, Circuit Judge.

Before its amendment in 1994, the antidumping statute directed that when a party to an antidumping proceeding failed to provide properly requested information, the Commerce Department was required to “use the best information otherwise available” in determining the appropriate antidumping duty rate. 19 U.S.C. § 1677e(e) (1988). Pursuant to that provision, the Commerce Department developed a protocol that allowed it to use the highest dumping margin established in any prior administrative review or in the less-than-fair-value proceeding as the “best information available”…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atlantic Sugar, Ltd. v. The United States and Amstar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
  2. Rhone Poulenc, Inc. And Rhone Poulenc Chimie De Base, S.A. v. The United States, Pq CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Allied-Signal Aerospace Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
  4. Borlem S.A.—Empreedimentos Industriais v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  5. D & L Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1993

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Ta Chen Stainless Steel Pipe, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
  2. Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  3. Ferro Union, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1999
  4. Shandong Huarong MacHinery Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2006
  5. Shanghai Taoen Intern. Trading Co., Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2005

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API