Legal Opinion
San Remo Hotel L.P. v. San Francisco City & County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 14, 2004No. 03-15853PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAWKINS, Circuit Judge:
In the second appeal before this court, the owners of the San Remo Hotel challenge the constitutionality of a San Francisco ordinance which restricts an owner’s ability to convert “residential” hotel rooms to tourist use. A prior panel ordered Pullman abstention at plaintiffs’ request, and also declared some claims unripe, deferring a decision until after the claim had been litigated in the California courts. San Remo Hotel v. City and County of San Francisco, 145 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir.1998) (“SanRemo I”).
After losing their state takings claims in the California courts,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Empress LLC v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- West Linn Corporate Park, L.L.C. v. City of West LinnOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- The San Remo Hotel L.P. v. San Francisco City And CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Empress LLC v. Cityand County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Jackson v. CooleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.