Legal Opinion
Maslauskas v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided March 27, 1984No. Civ.A.82-2193-GPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLOWING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
GARRITY, District Judge.
Plaintiff has filed suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), alleging that he was incarcerated illegally for 396 days as a result of negligent conduct by the United States Parole Commission (“the Commission”) and the United States Bureau of Prisons. The facts underlying plaintiff’s claim are set out in Maslauskas v. U.S. Board of Parole, 3 Cir.1980, 639 F.2d 935. Plaintiff alleges that on March 22, 1972 the Commission unlawfully issued a parole violator…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Ward v. CaulkCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Barry J. Quinones v. United States of America, and United States Bureau of Narcotics and Dangerous Drugs and Its Agents and EmployeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
- Sandutch v. MuroskiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- John C. Gross v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Crump v. Sabine River AuthoritySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Guzman Rivera v. Rivera CruzCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Russo Farms, Inc. v. Vineland Board of EducationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- LEJEUNE BROS. v. Goodrich Petroleum Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Doe v. Town of BlandfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.