Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chase Manhattan Bank v. Gavin

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 1, 1999No. SC 15875Published

1Dissent

MCDONALD, J.,

with whom BERDON, J., joins, dissenting. I disagree with the majority’s conclusion that the imposition of Connecticut’s state income tax on the entire income of the trusts does not violate due process of law or the commerce clause of the United States constitution. I would hold that Connecticut’s attempt to tax the entire income, all of which was produced outside the state of Connecticut, violates both due process and the negative implications of the commerce clause.

“The Due Process and Commerce Clauses of the [United States] Constitution . . . prevent States that impose an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Goldberg v. SweetSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Barclays Bank PLC v. Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API