Legal Opinion
Aguirre v. Lee
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 15, 1993No. A059840PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REARDON, J.
After a jury verdict in her favor on her action for violation of San Francisco’s Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Ordinance (Ordinance) (S.F. Admin. Code, ch. 37), respondent Irma Aguirre was awarded $75,000 from Tony and Shaw Lee. The Lees appeal, 1 contending that (1) section 12.19 of the Rules and Regulations (Regulations, section 12.19) of San Francisco’s Residential Rent Stabilization and Arbitration Board is invalid as a matter of law; (2) Aguirre’s action is barred by the statute of limitations; (3) the building containing Aguirre’s rental unit is exempt…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Justus v. AtchisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Ochoa v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Ontario Community Foundation, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Karlin v. ZaltaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Styne v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Lee v. BANK OF AMERICA NATIONAL TRUST AND SAVINGS ASS'NCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- City of Berkeley v. City of Berkeley Rent Stabilization BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994