Prisel v. Coney
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne; Donovan, J. Case by John Prisel, by next friend, against James D. Coney for personal injuries. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.
1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.
Plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages claimed to have been caused to him while operating a certain machine as an employé in defendant’s factory in *603Detroit. After hearing all of the proofs in the ease, a verdict was instructed by the court in favor of defendant. Plaintiff reviews the judgment upon writ of error. The only error assigned relates to the instruction directing a verdict.
Defendant was a manufacturer of wire specialties. On September 27, 1906, plaintiff, then about 16 years of age, entered into the employment of defendant, at first working as directed about the shop, and then…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Rumsey v. FoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Goda v. MaurerMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cabana v. City of HartMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
- Fleur v. Michigan Alkali Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1913