Legal Opinion

Goda v. Maurer

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1910No. Docket No. 52PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Monroe; O’Mealey, J. Case by John Goda against John Maurer and Charles Maurer, copartners as Maurer Bros., for personal injuries. A judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This was an action for damages for personal injuries received by plaintiff, as he claims, by reason of the negligence of defendants. Defendants were co-partners, engaged in business as contractors and builders, and, at the time plaintiff was injured, were engaged in the construction of a brick building in the city of Monroe. Plaintiff, a common laborer, had worked for defendants prior to his injury for over two months, while they were engaged upon other contracts. On this building his work, that of a common laborer, was wheeling brick. *622While so employed on the day in question, he was ordered…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Prisel v. ConeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Dascho v. Michigan Alkali Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Felske v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API