Legal Opinion

State v. Kumpula

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 21, 1984No. C3-82-1034PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Defendant was found guilty by a district court jury of aggravated robbery and assault with a dangerous weapon, Minn.Stat. §§ 609.11, subd. 1, 609.222, and 609.245 (1980). These charges were based on the May 8,1981, armed robbery of a drug store in Hilltop and the assault of a person during the getaway. The trial court sentenced defendant to prison terms of 81 and 54 months for the aggravated robbery and assault, with the terms running consecutively to each other but concurrently with a prior sentence for which parole was revoked. On appeal, defendant seeks an outright reversal…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Burdeau v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. Ronald James ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  5. State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  3. State v. WaukazoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
  4. State v. HoustonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Overline v. State, Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API