State v. Waukazo
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LANSING, Judge.
Appellant Martin Waukazo was convicted of second-degree assault and first-degree criminal sexual conduct in violation of Minn.Stat. §§ 609.222 and 609.342 (1984). He contends that the trial court committed reversible error in allowing Spreigl evidence of prior domestic violence between him and the complainant, his wife. Wauka-zo also contends that testimony regarding a statement he made to a police officer after receiving Miranda warnings was admitted in violation of his constitutional rights of due process and the privilege against self-incrimination. Waukazo further…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. FilippiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- State v. LangleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- State v. DarveauxSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. CurrieCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. ElvinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- State v. OstlundCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- State v. FolkersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State v. HattonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.