Legal Opinion

Estate of Gaspar v. Vogt, Brown & Merry

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 2003No. NonePublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In preparing wills for a husband and wife who wished to disinherit each other so that their children by previous marriages would receive their estates, the attorney failed to advise that waivers of their respective spousal elective shares would be necessary to accomplish their testamentary wishes. After the wife died, the husband obtained his elective share of half the wife’s estate. The wife’s estate then brought a legal malpractice action against the attorney. In finding against the attorney, the circuit court ruled in a bench trial that the loss to the wife’s…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wolff v. Secretary of the South Dakota Game, Fish & Parks DepartmentSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Matter of Estate of JetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Weiss v. Van NormanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Knudson v. HessSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Gabaig v. GabaigAlaska Supreme Court · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. First Premier Bank v. Kolcraft Enterprises, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hamilton v. SommersSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Hamilton v. Bangs, McCullen, Butler, Foye & Simmons, L.L.P.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
  4. Wells v. Howe Heating & Plumbing, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Holscher v. Valley Queen Cheese FactorySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API