Legal Opinion
Ash v. Hertz Corp.
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 27, 1997No. B109020PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VOGEL (Miriam A.), J.
The issue in this case is whether a writ petition filed in the appellate department of the superior court is the exclusive means to obtain appellate review of a municipal court’s order denying a motion to transfer a case to the superior court when that motion is made on the ground that the damages at issue exceed the municipal court’s jurisdiction. We hold that it is not, and that the municipal court’s order denying transfer may be reviewed by the appellate department on appeal from a final, appealable judgment.
Background
In 1990, Hiram Ash sued The Hertz…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Kowis v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Cook v. WinklepleckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- California Employment Stabilization Commission v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Schwenke v. J & P SCOTT, INC.California Court of Appeal · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- YTUARTE v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Parrott v. MOORING TOWNHOMES ASSN., INC.California Court of Appeal · 2003
- Pegastaff v. Public Utilities CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Horn v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. CA3California Court of Appeal · 2020
- PegaStaff v. Cal. PUCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015