Legal Opinion

Rostron v. Marriott Hotels

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided April 8, 1987No. Civ. A. 86-5693PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LUDWIG, District Judge.

In this action for personal injuries, defendant moves for summary judgment, Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b), asserting that plaintiff’s claim is time-barred. The complaint alleges that plaintiff fell on defendant’s property in California on July 4, 1984. Suit was instituted in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas on July 1, 1986 and removed to this court September 25, 1986. Subject matter jurisdiction arises from diversity of citizenship, 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (1982).

“A federal court, sitting in diversity, follows the forum’s choice of law rules to determine the applicable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mack Trucks, Inc. v. Bendix-Westinghouse Automotive Air Brake Company v. Latrobe Die Castingcompany, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Martinez v. TraubnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Grimmer v. Harbor TowersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  4. Hafer v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Gwaltney v. StoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Hayes v. Roberts & Schaefer Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Willey v. BrackenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Yoder v. Frontier Nursing Univ., Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API