Legal Opinion

Hafer v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided October 6, 1981No. Civ. A. 79-2880PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

EDWARD R. BECKER, District Judge.

Before us, on a motion for summary judgment, is the question whether this products liability action is barred by the application of Pennsylvania’s “borrowing statute.” The action was occasioned by the sudden blowout of a Firestone radial tire in Quebec, Canada, resulting in injury to the plaintiff, Raymond Hafer, who was driving the car on which the tire was mounted. The accident occurred on July 30, 1977. Suit was filed on July 2, 1979, within all potentially applicable Pennsylvania statutes of limitations for such a claim, but beyond the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Griffith v. United Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  2. Sondra L. McKenna and James R. McKenna v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
  3. Davis v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  4. Roberts v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Virginia J. Barry Melville v. American Home Assurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Johns-Manville Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Rostron v. Marriott HotelsDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API