Legal Opinion

Nashville Pure Milk Company v. Rychen

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1958PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Swepston

Mrs. Willie Marie Rychen filed her petition under the Workmen’s Compensation Act, T.C.A. sec. 50-901 et seq. to recover compensation on account of the death of her husband, A. T. Bychen, for the benefit of herself and two minor children. The chancellor heard the evidence and awarded compensation, from which decree comes this appeal by the former employer of the deceased A. T. Bychen.

The first assignment of error relating to the alleged erroneous admission in evidence of certain questions must be overruled because it does not comply with Bale 14(3) of this Court, which provides in part, “when…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Patterson Transfer Co. v. LewisTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coleman v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Central Motor Express, Inc. v. BurneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Bacon v. Sevier CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  4. AC Lawrence Leather Company v. LovedayTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Flowers v. South Central Bell Telephone Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API