Parham v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Nichols, Presiding Judge.
“While a defendant is entitled to be tried upon a perfect indictment or accusation, such right may be waived by failure to object until after conviction, and unless the accusation or indictment is so defective as to be absolutely void a motion in arrest of judgment, made after verdict, will not lie. Lanier v. State, 5 Ga. App. 472 (63 SE 536); Gravitt v. State, 36 Ga. App. 301 (136 SE 829).” Davis v. State, 106 Ga. App. 133 (1) (126 SE2d 486). The failure of the indictment to allege the correct date of the alleged larceny would make it subject to demurrer (Bailey v.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lanier v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Pippin v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Bailey v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
- Adkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Gravitt v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Mealor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
- Mimbs v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Saturday v. SaturdayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966