Legal Opinion

Pippin v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 14, 1931No. 7840PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAtkinson, J.

When a judgment has been rendered, either party may move in arrest thereof or to set it aside for any defect, not amendable, which appears on the face of the record or pleadings. Civil Code, § 5957. A motion in arrest of judgment differs from a motion for a new trial in this: The former must be predicated on some defect which appears on the face of the record or pleadings, while the latter must be predicated on some extrinsic matter not so appearing. § 5958. In Terrell v. State, 9 Ga. 58, it was held: “It appearing from the statement on the face of the *227indictment that the grand jury was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Regopoulas v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Spence v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  3. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1878
  4. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  5. Wells v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. FreemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  2. Hatcher v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1933
  3. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
  4. Simmons v. J. A. Jones Construction Co. Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1945
  5. Glover v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API