Legal Opinion
Seid Pak Sing v. Barker
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 23, 1932No. Docket No. 4436PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPreston, P. J.
In lieu of any preliminary statement of the case, reference is made to the former hearing in the earlier appeals. (Seid Pak Sing v. Barker, 197 Cal. 321 [240 Pac. 765].) The report fully covers the facts and our discussion will include only such features as are incidental to the contentions here presented.
The original complaint was filed on January 26, 1919, which date, therefore, was that of the commencement of the action. The original defendants were Barker, Miller, Grossman, Chicago Bonding and Surety Company, a corporation, with a number of fictitious defendants.
The action has been…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- White v. SchaderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Pickwick Stages v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- De Temple v. AlexanderCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Josephian v. LionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Williams v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Claude Fisher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
- Hopkins v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Fidelity Trust Co. v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Hauss v. ShinnDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022