Legal Opinion
In Re Pappas
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 24, 1922No. Crim. No. 616PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PREWETT, J., pro tem.
Teddy Pappas was convicted in a justice’s court of the crime of violating Ordinance No. 72 of the county of Yolo. He will be referred to in this opinion as the petitioner.
The operative portions of the complaint against him read as follows: “did then and there willfully and unlawfully keep, conduct and establish a place where alcoholic liquors were sold, served and distributed and were kept for the purpose of sale and distribution, and the place not Toeing then and there a licensed place of lousiness as provided in Ordinance No. 72 of said County of Yolo. ...”
The italics…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Spraigue v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Commonwealth v. NickersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1920
- In Re VolpiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- People v. CapelliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re HixsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
- People v. DraperAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1933
- In Re PappasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922