Legal Opinion

Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation Board

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 2, 1994No. C6-94-76Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Relator Marlene Meath challenges the Minnesota Harmful Substance Compensation Board’s decision to deny her claim for compensation for injuries from exposure to a harmful substance. We affirm.

FACTS

On May 22, 1989, Meath was exposed to anhydrous ammonia from a tank on her neighbor’s field. The tank had been left about 100 to 150 feet from Meath’s house by Farmers Elevator Company. She was exposed to the ammonia, in different concentrations, for about five to six hours. A month later, Meath contacted her doctor’s office about nonrespiratory matters. On two other occasions —…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  2. Cable Communications Board v. Nor-West Cable Communications PartnershipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  3. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Signal Delivery Service, Inc. v. Brynwood Transfer Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. In Re the Occupational License of HaymesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API