Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOODS (A. M.), P. J.
This original proceeding in mandate presents the narrow “good-faith settlement” issue of whether a defendant tortfeasor’s waiver of litigation costs in settling with a plaintiff constitutes “consideration paid” for the settlement within the meaning of section 877 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1 so as to reduce plaintiff’s total recovery against nonsettling defendants proportionately.
We determine that by operation of section 877, subdivision (a), a waiver of litigation costs by a settling defendant effects a reduction in the liability of nonsettling defendants in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Bogacki v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Widson v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
- Haskell v. CarliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Villa v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Erreca's v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
- Regan Roofing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Alcal Roofing & Insulation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Garcia v. DURO DYNE CORPORATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.