Legal Opinion

Armstrong World Industries, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 16, 1989No. B042228PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WOODS (A. M.), P. J.

This original proceeding in mandate presents the narrow “good-faith settlement” issue of whether a defendant tortfeasor’s waiver of litigation costs in settling with a plaintiff constitutes “consideration paid” for the settlement within the meaning of section 877 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1 so as to reduce plaintiff’s total recovery against nonsettling defendants proportionately.

We determine that by operation of section 877, subdivision (a), a waiver of litigation costs by a settling defendant effects a reduction in the liability of nonsettling defendants in…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tech-Bilt, Inc. v. Woodward-Clyde & AssociatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Abbott Ford, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Bogacki v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Widson v. International Harvester Co.California Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Haskell v. CarliCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Villa v. ColeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  2. Erreca's v. SUPERIOR COURT OF SAN DIEGO CTY.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  3. Regan Roofing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. Alcal Roofing & Insulation v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Garcia v. DURO DYNE CORPORATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API