Legal Opinion

Village of Caseyville v. Cunningham

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided October 9, 1985No. 5-84-0447PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harrison

Defendants, Stephen, Charles and Mary Cunningham, appeal from a judgment of the circuit court of St. Clair County granting plaintiff, the village of Caseyville, a permanent injunction against defendants. Defendants were enjoined from violating an ordinance which prohibited operation of defendants’ refrigerated truck during certain hours in certain areas.

Defendants contend the Illinois Environmental Protection Act preempted the area of noise control and that the ordinance is invalid. They claim the injunction granted the village was improper and that defendants should have been granted an…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. County of Cook v. John Sexton Contractors Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Crocker v. FinleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
  4. City of Carbondale v. BrewsterIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  5. City of Des Plaines v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Village of Sugar Grove v. RichAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  2. McCarthy v. KunickiAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. David E. Shelton Productions, Inc. v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Village of Algonquin v. Village of Barrington HillsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. State Bank of Waterloo v. City of WaterlooAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API