In re Hahn
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On order to show cause why the respondent should not be disbarred or otherwise disciplined and punished,
1Opinion of the Court
Walker, Chancellor.
Upon reading and filing affidavits made by Charles M. Kase, Albert C. Fletcher, Charles S. Peaker and Bertha Peaker, his wife, which charged Simon Hahn with malpractice as a solicitor in chancery, an order was made upon him to show cause why he should not be adjudged guilty and thereupon be debarred from further practice as a solicitor or counselor of this court, or be suspended from practice as a solicitor or counselor for such period as the chancellor should order, or be otherwise disciplined and punished as might be deemed equitable and just. v The gravamen of the charge…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of FitzsimonsNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- In the Matter of ____, an AttorneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- State v. McClaughertyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1889
- Morehouse v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- In re the Disbarment of SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Conover v. West Jersey Mortgage Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1924
- Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1958
- In Re New Jersey State Bar Assn.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1932