Legal Opinion

State v. Kieffer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1924No. File No. 5083PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFolley, J.

Assuming to act under the authority of a search warrant in their possession, appellants went upon and searched the premises of respondent. As a result of such search they found a still and other apparatus for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor, as well as a quantity of such liquor. Appellants seized the articles aforesaid, then causad the arrest of respondent on the charge of violating the prohibitionu law (Rev. Code 1919, §§ 10235-10328, as amended). It is assumed that appellants took, and- are holding, such property for. the purpose of using it as evidence in the prosecution of…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Sioux Falls v. WalserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Groton Independent Consolidated District No. 1 v. TrottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. GooderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. State ex rel. Meyer v. KeelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
  5. State v. NewharthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API