State v. Kieffer
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFolley, J.
Assuming to act under the authority of a search warrant in their possession, appellants went upon and searched the premises of respondent. As a result of such search they found a still and other apparatus for the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor, as well as a quantity of such liquor. Appellants seized the articles aforesaid, then causad the arrest of respondent on the charge of violating the prohibitionu law (Rev. Code 1919, §§ 10235-10328, as amended). It is assumed that appellants took, and- are holding, such property for. the purpose of using it as evidence in the prosecution of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- City of Sioux Falls v. WalserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- State v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
- Groton Independent Consolidated District No. 1 v. TrottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. GooderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- State ex rel. Meyer v. KeelerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- State v. HoffmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1928
- State v. NewharthSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.