State ex rel. Meyer v. Keeler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
The defendant concedes that the search warrant involved in this action was illegal and void and gave no right or authority to the defendant or to the officers associated with him to search the dwelling and other buildings belonging to the petitioners, because such search warrant was issued upon complaint made upon information and belief. Glodowski v. State, 196 Wis. 265, 220 N. W. 227; State v. Jaeger, 196 Wis. 99, 219 N. W. 281; Byars v. U. S. 273 U. S. 28, 47 Sup. Ct. 248.
The defendant, however, contends that since the furs and skins were found and seized in a building other than a…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Weeks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HerwigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1962
- State v. VoshartWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- Commonwealth v. AltizerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- State v. Merchandise SeizedSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- State v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934