Legal Opinion

State v. Newharth

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 6, 1926No. File No. 6134PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.

Defendant -was charged with, and convicted of, keeping and storing intoxicating liquor with intent to evade the provisions of the intoxicating liquor law of this state.

The only alleged error that is reviewable -upon tire record is whether the court erred in receiving in evidence certain exhibits. These exhibits were obtained by the officers under an alleged illegal search. A description of them is not contained in the printed *273record, but in that portion of appellant’s brief devoted to the argument they are said to be a pint bottle and a half-pint bottle of intoxicating liquor and a few tin…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. City of Sioux Falls v. WalserSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. KiefferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Walser v. City of Sioux FallsSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. GlickSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  2. State v. GooderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. LaneSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  4. State v. JacksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API