Legal Opinion
United States v. International Business Machines Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 5, 1974No. 69 Civ. 200 (DNE)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
EDELSTEIN, Chief Judge:
Pursuant to Pretrial Order No. 12 the parties in the above captioned action served a subpoena duces tecum and ad testificandum on Mathematica, Inc. (Mathematica). The subpoena, returnable January 16, 1974, commanded an officer of Mathematica to appear at a deposition and to bring with him documents listed in schedules attached to said subpoena.
Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(b) and Pretrial Order No. 12, Mathematica moved for an order modifying and conditioning the subpoena by:(1) adjourning the return date of the subpoena to April 16, 1974;(2) granting…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1966
- Collins & Aikman Corp. v. J. P. Stevens & Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- Blank v. Talley Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1972
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1979
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- Ghandi v. Police Department of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1977
- In re the Exxon ValdezDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1992
- Cantaline v. Raymark Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.