Legal Opinion

Blank v. Talley Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 18, 1972No. 70 Civ. 4144PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GURFEIN, District Judge.

MEMORANDUM

A subpoena duces tecum having been served on Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner & Smith, requesting the names and last-known addresses as shown on its records of the stockholders of General Time Corporation as of the close of business on April 13, 1970, that firm on its own behalf and as successor in interest to Goodbody & Co. requested $570 as costs before complying.

Treating this request as a timely motion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 45(b), this Court denies Merrill Lynch’s application. See United States v. American Optical Co., 39 F.R.D. 580, 586-587 (N.D.Cal.1966)…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. American Optical Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1966

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1978
  2. Gold v. Ernst & ErnstCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
  3. Cantaline v. Raymark Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1984
  4. United States v. International Business Machines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
  5. Stern v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API