Legal Opinion
United States ex rel. Koch v. Koch Industries, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Oklahoma
Decided July 6, 1999No. 91-CV-763-KPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
KERN, Chief Judge.
Now before the Court are the objections of both parties to the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation filed April 7, 1999. The Court has undertaken a de novo review, pursuant to Rule 72(b) F.R.Cv.P. This is an action brought pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)-(f). These provisions “authorize private individuals, acting on behalf of the United States, to bring a civil action against those who defraud the government.” United States ex rel. Ramseyer v. Century Healthcare Corp., 90 F.3d 1514, 1517 (10th Cir.1996).
The…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- United States v. KubrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Dennis Wayne Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Murray Stein v. Reynolds Securities, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kreindler & Kreindler, Cross-Appellee v. United Technologies Corporation, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Talley v. HesseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Olech v. Village of WillowbrookDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2000
- United States Ex Rel. Pogue v. Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- United States Ex Rel. Downy v. Corning, Inc.District Court, D. New Mexico · 2000
- Estate of Kuhns v. MarcoSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
- Ultraflo Corp. v. Pelican Tank Parts, Inc.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.