Zink v. Pittsburg & Midway Coal Mining Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUARK, Presiding Judge.
This is defendants’ appeal from a judgment for plaintiffs based on a jury verdict in the sum of eight thousand dollars. . We will refer to the parties as designated below.
The petition combined in one count several possible causes of action in one conglomerate mass. Too lengthy to set forth verbatim, it charged that plaintiffs gave defendants’ assignors and privies two separate coal mining leases on two separate and distinct tracts of land, one of 180 acres, another of 240 acres; that in said leases defendants contracted to mine the land in a good and workmanlike manner;…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hawkins v. StuddardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Jones v. LinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Rucker v. HarringtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1893
- Fisher v. MiceliSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Rexite Casting Co. v. Midwest Mower Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1954
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jackson v. ShainMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Chandler v. Rosewin Coats, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1974
- Klinckman v. PharrisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- ARG International, AG v. Olin CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2021
- Lippman v. DeslogeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984