Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Shain

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 30, 1981No. WD 32057PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHANGLER, Judge.

The plaintiff Jackson sued for the specific performance of an oral agreement, concluded between counsel, to settle a quiet title suit pendent against defendant Shain. The answer of the defendant set up the bar of the Statute of Frauds and also that the agreement was without authority. The court found that the settlement agreement was sufficiently performed by the plaintiff to avoid the effect of the Statute of Frauds, and entered specific performance for that party. The defendant appeals.

The subject of the oral agreement between counsel was a suit brought in two counts by…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Walker v. BohannanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  2. Jones v. LinderSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  3. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. RoussinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. Alonzo v. LaubertSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  5. DeWitt v. LutesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sappington v. MillerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Geisinger v. a & B FARMS, INC.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Olson v. Idaho Department of Water ResourcesIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gegg v. KieferMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Crane v. Centerre Bank of ColumbiaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API