Barrett v. Emanuel Hospital
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Plaintiffs brought this action to recover damages for mental and nervous disorders Mr. Barrett allegedly suffered as a result of knee surgery. The defendants are the two surgeons, the anesthesiologist, the hospital where the surgery was performed and the professional corporation which employs the surgeons. Plaintiffs alleged, inter alia, that all of the defendants, acting “jointly and in concert,” had exclusive control of Mr. Barrett’s person and of all instrumentalities used during the surgery. Plaintiffs therefore contend that they are entitled to proceed on the principle of res ipsa…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Maki v. Murray HospitalMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Mayor v. DowsettOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Watzig v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Kaufman v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Schaffner v. Cumberland County Hospital System, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Shepard v. Sisters of ProvidenceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Fieux v. Cardiovascular & Thoracic Clinic, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Hammer v. Fred Meyer Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Hoven v. Rice Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.