Legal Opinion

City of Los Angeles v. City of South Gate

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 22, 1930No. Docket No. 6252PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMPSON (IRA F.), J.

In 1923 the legislature passed an act purporting to grant “to every municipal corporation of the State of California the right to construct, operate and maintain water and gas pipes, mains and conduits, electric light and electric power lines, telephone and telegraph lines, sewers and sewer mains, all with their necessary appurtenances, across, along, in, under, over or upon any road, street, alley, avenne or highway, and across, under or over any railway, canal, ditch or flume which the route of such work intersects, crosses or runs along, in such a manner as to afford…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. US Bank v. PLANTERS'BANKSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  2. In the Matter of the Application of Henry W. CooperNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  3. City of Pasadena v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Quinchard v. Board of TrusteesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. HopkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. Southern California Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State of California v. Marin Municipal Water Dist.California Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Alfaro v. TerhuneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. Sacramento Municipal Utility District v. Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. County of Los Angeles v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API