Legal Opinion

Indianapolis, Decatur & Western Railway Co. v. Wilson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 16, 1893No. 16,083PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Putnam Circuxt Court.

1Opinion of the CourtOlds, J.

This is an action by the appellee against the appellant for damages resulting from an injury alleged to have occurred at a highway crossing by reason of the negligence of the appellant.

There was a demurrer filed to the complaint by appel*96lant for want of facts, which was overruled, and exception taken. Issues were joined, and a verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of appellee for $7,000. Appellant filed a motion for a new trial, which was overruled.

Errors are assigned that the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and on the overruling of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Brazil Block Coal Co. v. HoodletIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. WalkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Shoner v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co. v. HowardIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Ohio & Mississippi Railway Co. v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MilesIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. City of Evansville v. SenhennIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Indianapolis Railways, Inc. v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1945
  4. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. BoytsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Phillips v. CroyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API