Legal Opinion

J. C. Hubinger Bros. v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 20, 1923PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, C. J.

The action arises under the Interstate Commerce Law. There is no dispute in the facts.

It appears that, in September and October, 1909, the plaintiff shipped two carloads of feed, consigned to New York. Bills of lading were issued by defendant for each car, and they contain the condition that claims for loss, damage, or delay must be made in writing to the carrier at the point of delivery or at the point of origin within four months after delivery of the property, or, in case of failure to deliver, then within four months after a reasonable time for delivery has elapsed; and that, unless…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Georgia, Florida & Alabama Railway Co. v. Blish Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. StarbirdSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Doyle v. BurnsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smith v. Middle States Utilities Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API