Legal Opinion
Black v. Payne
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 15, 1979No. 76-2906PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Hollis O. Black appeals from the district court’s dismissal of his suit challenging the change in mandatory retirement age for certain California state employees. We affirm.
I. Statement of the Case
Appellant Black began working for the state of California on December 2, 1970. At that time, the mandatory retirement age applicable to Black was age 70. As a state worker, Black was enrolled in the state’s pension program, the Public Employees Retirement System (PERS), Cal.Gov’t Code § 20000.
In 1971, the California legislature enacted Senate Bill 249, Stats.1971, ch. 170, § 38,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Bishop v. WoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- United Housing Foundation, Inc. v. FormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kehr Packages, Inc. v. Fidelcor, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Marilyn Wheeler v. Main HurdmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 97,588 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stephen MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Janicki Logging Co. v. Bruce Mateer Dale RobertsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.