Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pate v. Channel Lumber Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 8, 1997No. C021940PublishedCited by 13 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PUGLIA, P. J.

This appeal involves a commercial landlord tenant dispute. Plaintiffs are tenants of the Boatworks Mall, a retail shopping mall located in Tahoe City. Plaintiffs commenced the underlying action in November 1993 against the owner of the mall, defendant Channel Lumber Company.

In May 1994, plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. The second amended complaint pleads separate counts for breach of contract, misrepresentation, and declaratory relief. The declaratory relief issues were severed and tried separately to the court. The breach of contract and misrepresentation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Deyo v. KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  3. Young v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  4. Karz v. KarlCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. McGinty v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Sherman v. Kinetic Concepts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. New Albertsons, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. Bookout v. State of California Ex Rel. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. Channel Lumber Co., Inc. v. Porter SimonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. Sierra View Local Health Care District v. Sierra View Medical Plaza AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API