Legal Opinion
Veryzer v. Secretary of Health & Human Services
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided September 29, 2011No. 06-522VPublishedCited by 221 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
This case comes before the court on review of a decision after remand. The scope of the remand was narrow, i.e., to make findings of fact and conclusions of law on petitioner’s medical records insofar as they were relied upon as proof of causation. See Veryzer v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 98 Fed.Cl. 214, 228 (2011) (“Veryzer III ’’j.1 The special master implemented the mandate, reopening the record for additional evidence in the process. See Veryzer v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 2011 WL 1935813 (Fed. Cl. Spec.Mstr. Apr. 29,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Althen v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Moberly v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Andreu Ex Rel. Andreu v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Rose Capizzano v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by221 opinions
- Shapiro v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Contreras v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Paluck ex rel. Paluck v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- Contreras v. Secretary of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
- K.L. v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human ServicesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
216 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.