In re Quentin L.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: We reject the contention of respondent that Family Court abused its discretion in directing that he be placed with the New York State Division for Youth. Respondent’s placement is "the least restrictive available alternative * * * consistent with the needs and best interests of the respondent and the need for protection of the community” (Family Ct Act § 352.2 [2] [a]; see, Matter of Edward V., 204 AD2d 1060).
The persistent failure of respondent to attend school, obey his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Halloran v. Virginia Chemicals Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Di Prospero v. Ford Motor Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re Edward V.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Clam Lake Development, Inc. v. Town BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re the Peter VV.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- King v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. DuryeeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- In re Kyle H.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- In re Donald M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- DURYEE, STEPHEN M., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.