In re Donald M.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: In this juvenile delinquency proceeding, Family Court found, based on respondent’s admission, that respondent had committed acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute petit larceny (Penal Law § 155.25). Based on evidence adduced at the dispositional hearing, the court additionally found that allowing respondent to remain at home would be contrary to his best interests and contrary to the community’s need for protection, and that respondent required the supervision and structured setting that only an “out-of-home placement”…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- In re Katherine W.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
- In re Jason W.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- In re Quentin L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Van Vorse v. TeresiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re Lloyd L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Marsharita K.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000