Legal Opinion

In re Kyle H.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 23, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*742Although the order of disposition is phrased in terms of placement of the respondent with a private agency pursuant to Family Court Act § 353.3 (4), the Family Court’s decision expressed a preference to place the respondent at a limited-secure state facility, and the order of disposition itself places the respondent with the New York State Office of Children and Family Services (hereinafter OCFS) for placement in the Tryon Facility, which is a state-operated facility. In light of the irregularity in the order of disposition, it is reversed insofar as appealed from to provide for placement of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re Lavar C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re Quentin L.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re Kyle S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Christopher A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  2. In re Robin G.New York City Family Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API