Legal Opinion
In Re the Request for an Advisory Opinion Concerning the Construction of H.B. 1388 as Amended by H.B. 1389
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 30, 1986No. 15302PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TO HIS EXCELLENCY, WILLIAM J. JANKLOW, THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA
Pursuant to the authority vested in the Governor under Article V, § 5 of the South Dakota Constitution, you have requested an opinion of the Supreme Court on important questions of law involved in the exercise of your executive power. The factual basis of your request is:
The legislature recently enacted H.B. 1388 as amended by H.B. 1389 (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Act”) establishing the South Dakota Agriculture and Business Development Authority for the purpose, among others, of issuing bonds or…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Central Lumber Co. v. South DakotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- State ex rel. Richards v. WhismanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
- C. v. Floyd Fruit Co. v. Florida Citrus CommissionSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
- Miller v. Michigan State Apple CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1941
- Hodges v. SnyderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. HalversonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- In Re JanklowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Poppen v. WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994