Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 4, 2006No. A05-1001PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Nicollet County Board' of County Commissioners contends that because the drainage authority is the proper arbiter of claims asserted under the drainage code, the district court erred in determining that it had subject matter jurisdiction over a drainage-related claim brought under the Minnesota Environmental Rights Act (MERA).

FACTS

County ditch 46A (CD46A) was established by appellant’s approval in 1907. 1 It runs from the northeast corner of Mud Lake to the southern portion of Little Lake in Nicollet County, Minnesota. In 1950, appellant ordered an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Wallace v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  3. McGowan v. Our Savior's Lutheran ChurchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
  4. Cochrane v. Tudor Oaks Condominium ProjectCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  5. Johnson v. MurraySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  2. State Ex Rel. Swan Lake Area Wildlife Ass'n v. Nicollet County Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
  3. Vogel v. Marathon Oil CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Vogel v. Marathon Oil CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  5. White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API