Legal Opinion
Cohen v. Bloch
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 1, 1980No. 78 Civ. 3909 (RWS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
The defendant PRF Corporation (“PRF”) and the individual director-defendants Ephraim Bloch, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer (“Bloch”) and five other persons comprising the complete PRF board (“the directors”), have moved to dismiss the amended and supplemental complaint in this shareholder derivative suit for failure of the plaintiff Ruth Cohen (the “shareholder” or “derivative plaintiff”) to fulfill the requirements of Rule 23.1 of the Fed.R.Civ.P. The motions presumably were made under Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c); material in addition to the pleadings…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ross v. BernhardSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Surowitz v. Hilton Hotels Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Dolgow v. AndersonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1968
- Dorothy Elfenbein v. Gulf & Western Industries, Inc., and Stelux Manufacturing Co., and Bulova Watch Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kirby v. Cullinet Software, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1987
- Rothenberg v. Security Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- Rothenberg v. Security Management Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- In Re Bank of New York Derivative LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- First Hartford Corporate Pension Plan & Trust v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.