Legal Opinion

Bosworth v. Shuck

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 9, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Case 57 — Mandamus by Finley Shuck against H M. Boswobth, State Treasurer, to Require Him to Pay Plaintiff fob Clerical Services in the Auditor’s Office of Public Accounts. appeal from franklin circuit court — -JAMES E. CANTRELL, circuit JUDGE. Judgment for Plaintiff and Defendant Appeals. (No briefs.)

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the court by

Chief Justice BURNAM

Reversing.

On the 30tb of July, 1903, tbe appellee, Finley Shuck, filed bis petition in tbe Franklin circuit court against Gus. G. Coulter, Auditor of Public Accounts of tbe State of Kentucky, in which be alleged that be bad rendered clerical services as chief of tbe claims department in tbe auditor’s office from tbe 1st of March, 1900, until tbe 1st of March, 1903, under tbe following written agreement: “I hereby *459appoint the Hon. Finley Shuck, of Lebanon, Marion county, to the position in the auditor’s office known as chief in claims department at a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Angarica v. BayardSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. People ex rel. Thatcher v. Village of Hyde ParkIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Commonwealth v. BoutwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Page v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. OatesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1958
  2. Hager v. ShuckCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1905
  3. Dishman v. Coleman, Auditor of CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API