Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided November 30, 1988No. 13-87-236-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KENNEDY, Justice.

Beth Smith was tried by a jury and convicted for theft. The trial court assessed punishment at three years confinement, with restitution as a condition of parole. Appellant brings four points of error, complaining of a defect in the indictment, the sufficiency of the evidence, the court’s setting the sum of restitution as a condition for parole, and the court’s informing the jury of the degree of the offense in the charge.

William Renfro hired appellant as bookkeeper for his business, Renfro Publishing Company. Renfro testified that, when he became concerned about the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
  2. Houston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  3. Ferguson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
  5. Gorman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Garcia v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
  2. Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  3. Askari v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2003
  4. Antonio Marquise Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009
  5. Antonio Marquise Jackson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API