Legal Opinion

Maysville Transit Co. v. Ort

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided November 3, 1943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Cammack —

Reversing in part and affirming in part.

This is one of the eight suits referred to in the case of Tomlin v. Taylor, 290 Ky. 619, 162 S. W. (2d) 210. Since the opinion in that case sets forth the basis of the controversy between the Maysville Transit Company and its president, and Hiram M. Taylor, a citizen of Maysville, James Purdon, the publisher of The Daily Independent, and Harry Ort, a city commissioner, we deem it unnecessary to go into a discussion of those facts here.

In this suit the Maysville Transit Company, a corporation, is seeking damages…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Louisville v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1864
  2. Western Union Telegraph Co. v. GuardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1940
  3. Tomlin v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
  4. Roberts v. HargisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. CNA Financial Corp. v. Local 743 of International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  2. Oasis Nite Club, Inc. v. DIEBOLD, INCORPORATEDDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1966
  3. Ass'n for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc. v. Nation Co.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Association for Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc. v. Emergency Civil Liberties CommitteeNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Maysville Transit Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API