Tomlin v. Taylor
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court by
Judge Cammack
— Affirming.
This is one of eight suits filed against the appellees, Hiram M. Taylor and James Pur don, and Harry Ort by the appellant, Roy Tomlin, and A. B. Rouse, F. W. Dempsey and the Maysville Transit Company. Damages in the sum of $50,000 are sought in each case. While the petitions are said to be the same, in all the actions, this case involves only the suit of Tomlin against Taylor and Pur don. A demurrer was sustained to Tomlin’s petition as amended; hence the only question before us is whether or not the petition stated a cause of action.
The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brents v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Rhodes v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
- Trammell v. Citizens News Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hazlitt v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1953
- Maysville Transit Co. v. OrtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- Maysville Transit Co. v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943
- No., Colorado Attorney General Reports1977
- Tomlin v. OrtCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1943