Legal Opinion

Hammonds v. Hammonds

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1958No. A-6715PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Culver

In the settlement betwen these parties of litigation that had put in issue the title to several tracts of land, the petitioners, Mrs. Jim Hammonds et al., agreed to pay all court costs and *518judgment was entered in conformity. During the course of this litigation and pending appeal from an order overruling a plea of privilege, the Court on application by petitioners, appointed a receiver. Respondents appealed from this interlocutory order and gave a corporate surety supersedeas bond on which the premium was $1,000. Because we had, subsequently to the appointment of the receiver, reversed and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Reaugh v. McCollum Exploration Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Patton v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Pendery v. Panhandle Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Brandtjen & Kluge, Inc. v. ManneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  5. Vance v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1883

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Phillips v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Flint & Associates v. Intercontinental Pipe & Steel, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  3. Whitley v. KingCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Eberts v. Businesspeople Personnel Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  5. Rogers v. Cassidy, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API